Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome, Traveler, to Heroes of the Net!

Right now you're a Guest, so there's a lot you don't have access to: the chatbox, arcade, download center, and more. To make posts and have access to the entire forum all you have to do is register.

But be warned, Heroes of the Net is a different kind of forum. We're an online community of friends and enemies alike; all looking to have fun. This is a place where everyone can be themselves and openly speak their mind. Heroes of the Net is a community of individuals and while all the rest of the world is yellow, we choose to be pink.

If this is the community you'd thrive in, fit in, and enjoy being a part of, then by all means: Welcome to Heroes of the Net and enjoy your stay!

Register!


Login here if you're already a member:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Origin of Religion?; the psychological origins of the divine
Topic Started: Jul 13 2008, 05:31 AM (154 Views)
SonicSoulstrike
Member Avatar
Asha'man

This is something I wrote in response to something in another forum a long time ago, and reading the 'disproving evolution' prompted me to post this to see what you'd all think

Quote:
 
*avoids b-slap* okay then. What we know is generally about getting the same results every time such that we can identify cause and effect relationships and predict the outcomes of related experiments to test (other, related tests help narrow down possible causes and get us to what truly causes such and such to happen). What we know at first is largely confined to what the five senses can tell us. We know what we can observe or experience and measure (sometimes). We know what a pear tastes like, but we can't really measure it, (save in the chemical receptors it triggers, i suppose).

back to the cause-result stuff. back in the ancient times, before people really took the time to closely study the causes of much of what happens in the world, people usually jumped to a hasty conclusion if they saw even the tiniest similarity or coincidence between two cases (or saw anthing unique from that one situation compared to everything else). They took 'precautions' to make sure some of these things didn't happen, and when they didn't happen again, they thought they had the answer.

Behold, the birth of superstition!!!!

In all of this, men begin to notice that there was a certain order to everything the natural world. Though it was sad that that little bird over there fell out of a tree and died, it made a meal for that fox over there, etc,etc... From this, among other things, people derived false (arguably) purpose: it's all for some higher design we're not privy to. And no design is possible without a designer (arguably)... So what we have is someone out there, looking out for us, making every A-Ok, just for us humans. "you know what, jorge? I think it'd be a good idea to keep that big guy happy, so everything goes right for us. better safe than sorry, ya know...". Heh, we'd all like to believe there's someone else out there, making sure things work out for us the way we want it, or even better than that. "No worries here, mate, the big guy'll take care of us". We'd also like to be able to control things we really can't, like the weather. "He'll take care of us, as long as we're faithful". Yep, we control the world with our faith, because we can't do it with anything else. "oh look, that guy didn't make it... he must have been bad/evil (he didn't sacrifice or pray last winter...) and displeased the big guy (let this be a lesson to ye of little faith)... or it was his time to go, it was part of the plan all along, he's better off now..." yessir, it's wonderful to know stuff will all turn out good in the end. Bah. BUT... order and balance =/= purpose...
Posted Image
Imma dragon slayer!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Setoshin
Member Avatar


I also heard a theory that 'prophets' from various religions might merely be schizophrenia or epilipse sufferers.

I pretty much agree. All modern religions probably stem from very basic superstitious ideals that were created by our forefathers. Then various ideas from that region merge together and are moudled by the perspectives of the society.

Even more fascinating on the order of religion is the early 20th Century Sociologist Emile Durkheim's theory that religion merely is the worship of society and nothing more. Think about it, the religion in an area reflects the norms and values of the people there, so we subconsciously or in the case of Scientology consciously mould fables and myths which propagate them.
Proud member (and pimp) of C.O.P.P.E.R.S.B.
Comprehensive, Perfectly Pure, Enticing, Ridiculously Superior Beings.

la vida es una solo es la manifestacion de los sueños y los sueños se escogen

Quote:
 

Setoshin: I think Nommie has a thing for Nubi

Anomaly: Why do you think I've been quiet these past few minutes seto? I've been fapping away at her posts

Setoshin: Nommie that's nasty. Who faps to Christian Conservative Rhetoric? That's like me masturbating to a jpeg of John McCain.

Anomaly: I have weird fetishes, okay?!


Quote:
 
PainWhisper doesn't steal Nubi's mic and go "Yo Nubi, I'm really happy for you, I'll let you finish, but Seto had one of the best flames of all time!"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Maelstrom
Member Avatar
Tempest

Was writing in response to something on Deviant Art (of all places) and figured it would work here as well, just to further emphasize my first post.

Also, Durkheim's theory does make a lot of sense. Although as for the 'prophets' some may be from some mental disorder. Others may be the shrewd machinations of shrewd men. As one quote goes, "Religion is seen as false by the wise, true by masses, and useful to the powerful."

Quote:
 

Words and categories are nothing in reality, but are defined by that which IS reality. There is no deep and simple knowledge except existence, which exists only because we exist and can perceive it. Everything else is learned through being, through experiencing.

Pain. We don't know what that is, initially. And why do we avoid it? Why can we not bear it? Because our genes tells our mind that we cannot. It's just an experience in our mind, that exists in it's own way only in the mind. The mechanism is there to make us avoid it, because in that way lies survival. The difference between pain and, say, tasting something sweet is that mechanism. As well as the mechanism evolved into our genes that lets us know that something sweet is something that will help sustain our existence.

Your 'know without knowing.' You say it and don't even know what it really is to let go of knowledge, if you are using that to justify/prove god. Because if you did, you'd know that there is no immediate leap to the idea that there is a god. Without a religious upbringing, there'd be no reason to even think of some supernatural caretaker with special rules for you to follow unless someone told you about it. You'd exist, and then the mechanism of the evolution of life would tell you that you need food. You breathe, you don't know why, or even consider the question, but you know that if you don't, you can't stand the sensation. And so many other little things like that shape and guide your existence.

So where does god come in? he doesn't. It's a fanciful security blanket people cling to so that they believe they're in complete control of their existence. Life drives us to control our surroundings so that we can continue to exist, so that we consume instead of being consumed by the rest of life. To that end has man's mind evolved. To think, to find ways of controlling. To learn how things work. But when people think and find that they can't control everything reliably... well, those things they do that seems to sometimes control it and sometimes not. Those things turn into superstition. "Better safe than sorry." Life sometimes demands that we be safe so we can continue to exist. Other times, it requires risk, to fight for survival. Because staying the course won't work anymore. Those superstitions later develop into religion. That gap of knowledge of what really causes things to happen, well, that gap isn't easily abided by our seeking minds. So, some people fill it with something that explains things, but doesn't need explaining. god and god's will. Who knows what god's will is, but we usually carry on and survive, so this will of god's must be for the best. I mean, it must be for the best and god must be benevolent because if something that could do all that (control luck... existence really) hated us and wanted us dead, well, there'd be nothing to stop it. We're all here, alive, ain't we? Seems somewhat reasonable, but it's really all out of the air. But it's an answer that pleases people's minds, as long as they don't look to closely at it.
Team1
Posted Image
Atheists, agnostics, and theists aren't all that different:
Atheists think all religions are bullshit.
Theists think all religions except for their's are bullshit.
Agnostics can't decide which religion has the least bullshit.

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Maelstrom
Member Avatar
Tempest

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iMmvu9eMrg

DANG!! This pretty much covers everything I've thought and tried to explain about the orignins of religion and more. Gotta thank Kyagh for this one. Happened to find it as a vid related to the Richard Dawkins playlist he posted.
Team1
Posted Image
Atheists, agnostics, and theists aren't all that different:
Atheists think all religions are bullshit.
Theists think all religions except for their's are bullshit.
Agnostics can't decide which religion has the least bullshit.

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Setoshin
Member Avatar


If we really delve into it, religion is an accurate reflection of the current state of society in which it was formulated and exists from.

For example, if we look at the Old Testament/Torah then it shows us the anguish felt by the Jews at that point. They were being continually expelled, discriminated against and engaged in conflict with the surrounding tribes of that area. Therefore we get a God and religion portrayed in the Old Testament as having the following characteristics:

- Very authoritarian. Prohibits things such as homosexuality, certain kinds of foods and clothing and other stuff. This could arguably stem from the Israelites position as being a race continually under seige and from their desire to expand territorially. So by creating a society whereby deviations from social norms were restricted, it acts as an attempt to harmonise society and prevent it from schism. Therefore an authoritarian belief system develops not from something divine, but rather from the desires of the so-called 'Prophets'. It's like McCarthy era America. In order to preserve unity against the Communist threat, social control became tighter. Homosexuality, left-leaning philosophy were all frowned upon and at times subdued. True patriotism could be achieved by conservative values and unquestioning obediance to the state.

- Messianic desire- Due to the loss of power the Jews faced from the Babylonian conquests and the general descrimination they would have suffered after the conquest, one could imagine the longing for better days. People would have blamed themselves for the general crappiness they would have endured. One could imagine the elders preaching on the corner of a street, criticising the "wayward youth for neglecting God" and claiming that their abysmal state was due to divine retribution. Therefore people would have created some sort of supernatural figure that would heal their race and restore them eventually. We could look to various cults across the world for this. For example if we turn to my father's home nation of Uganda, during the 1980s a prophet called Joseph Kony emerged amongst the much subjugated Acholi ethnic group. He claimed to be a messenger from God, and currently is waging guerilla warfare against the more prosperous south in an attempt to establish a theocratic realm full of peace and harmony.

I mean if we turn to Islam and it's literal meaning of "submit" you could argue that it represents the repressive elements in the society that the individuals have been conditioned to accept.
Proud member (and pimp) of C.O.P.P.E.R.S.B.
Comprehensive, Perfectly Pure, Enticing, Ridiculously Superior Beings.

la vida es una solo es la manifestacion de los sueños y los sueños se escogen

Quote:
 

Setoshin: I think Nommie has a thing for Nubi

Anomaly: Why do you think I've been quiet these past few minutes seto? I've been fapping away at her posts

Setoshin: Nommie that's nasty. Who faps to Christian Conservative Rhetoric? That's like me masturbating to a jpeg of John McCain.

Anomaly: I have weird fetishes, okay?!


Quote:
 
PainWhisper doesn't steal Nubi's mic and go "Yo Nubi, I'm really happy for you, I'll let you finish, but Seto had one of the best flames of all time!"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Debate Forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply

.Wiredvage Theme created by Zeus00 and converted by Wolt of the ZetaBoards Theme Zone